Peer review is a system used to assess the quality of a scientific manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers with expertise in the relevant field evaluate submitted manuscripts for originality, validity, and significance in order to help editors determine whether the manuscript is suitable for publication in the journal.
Sci-Lum Journal of Biomedicine operates under a double-blind peer review model.
All manuscripts submitted to Sci-Lum Journal of Biomedicine undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process, which ensures the highest standards of scientific quality. Each submission is initially assessed by the editorial team, who evaluate the manuscript for originality, language clarity, ethical and academic compliance, and thematic relevance to the journal’s scope. If the manuscript fails to meet any of these criteria, it may be rejected at the editorial level without being sent for external review.
Manuscripts that pass this initial screening are forwarded to at least two independent experts in the relevant field, who evaluate the submission under double-blind conditions. Each reviewer provides a written assessment, which is shared with the Editor-in-Chief. The final decision — acceptance, rejection, or request for revision — is made by the Editor-in-Chief, based on the reviewers’ recommendations.
Sci-Lum is committed to fair, transparent, and constructive peer review, grounded in the principles of open science, academic integrity, and high editorial standards.
